Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Soto
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided April 11, 2008No. 1070118Published
1Opinion of the Court
991 So.2d 691 (2008)
Ex parte Aurora Mercedes SOTO.
(In re Aurora Mercedes Soto
v.
State of Alabama).
1070118.
Supreme Court of Alabama.
April 11, 2008.
Nathan Johnson, Sheffield, for petitioner.
Submitted on petitioner's brief only.
BOLIN, Justice.
WRIT DENIED. NO OPINION.
SEE, LYONS, WOODALL, STUART, SMITH, and PARKER, JJ., concur.
COBB, C.J., and MURDOCK, J., concur specially.
COBB, Chief Justice (concurring specially).
I agree with the majority that Aurora Mercedes Soto's petition for the writ of certiorari is due to be denied.
Soto's bare allegation that she "would... argue that the record in [her] case…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Schenck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Virginia v. BlackSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Watts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.