Legal Opinion

Wilson v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 6, 1966No. 3 Div. 245PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMPSON, Justice.

This is a proceeding to have defendant below furnished with free transcript on appeal from a conviction of robbery and for appointment of counsel. The matter is presented to us by appeal and in the alternative by petition for mandamus. Appeal is the proper method of review. Ex parte Hite, 279 Ala. 78, 181 So.2d 892; Seals v. State, 276 Ala. 654, 16S So.2d 742; Ex parte Wade, Ms., Ante p. 92, 190 So.2d 285 (Sept. 15, 1966).

The petition presented to the trial judge stated that defendant desired to take an appeal under the provisions of Code, Title IS, §§ 380(14)-380(2S); that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Seals v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Seals v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
  3. Ex parte HiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
  4. Ex parte WadeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. ByrnesSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979
  2. State v. PowellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  3. Adams v. City of PelhamCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API