Legal Opinion
United States v. GTS Adm. Wm. Callaghan
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 10, 1986No. 83 Civ. 7957 (RWS)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
SWEET, District Judge.
The GTS ADMIRAL WILLIAM CALLAGHAN (the “CALLAGHAN”), her owner and underwriter seek damages by way of a third-party claim against the third party defendant McAllister Bros., Inc. (“McAllister”) arising out of an allision on May 13, 1979 when the CALLAGHAN struck the east bulkhead of the Military Ocean Terminal (the “Términal”). On the findings and conclusions set forth below, the third-party claim will be denied, and judgment will be entered dismissing the third party complaint with costs and disbursements.
Prior Proceedings
The complaint of the United States against the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bisso v. Inland Waterways Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Sun Oil Co. v. Dalzell Towing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- City of Boston v. S.S. Texaco Texas, Her Engines, Boilers, Etc., Texaco Panama, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- American Diamond Lines, Inc. v. McAllister Towing & Transportation Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- Tankers And Tramps Corporation v. Tugs Jane McallisterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. GTS Adm. Wm. CallaghanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986