Legal Opinion

American Diamond Lines, Inc. v. McAllister Towing & Transportation Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 13, 1939No. 104PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

Upon the facts as stated in the previous opinion, The West Eldara, 101 F.2d 45, with which familiarity is now assumed, we held that the pilotage clause was not binding upon the ship owner. This is so be*671cause the charterer was not the agent of the owner in contracting with the towing company to dock the vessel. The Niels R. Finsen, D.C., 52 F.2d 795; The Kate, 164 U.S. 458, 17 S.Ct. 135, 41 L.Ed. 512.

Under this time charter which was not a demise, it is clear that the navigation of the vessel was the responsibility of the owner rather than that of the charterer. As between those two the acts…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Savings Bank v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. The DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  3. Sturgis v. BoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
  4. The KateSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. The VolundCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People of State of California v. the Jules FribourgDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1956
  2. Ocean Cargo Lines, Ltd. v. North Atlantic Marine Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1964
  3. Tankers And Tramps Corporation v. Tugs Jane McallisterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
  4. Rawls Brothers Contractors, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1966
  5. International Terminal Operating Co. v. Naviera Aznar, S.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1961

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API