Rethorst v. Rethorst
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.
Henry J. Rethorst appeals from that portion of the interlocutory judgment which awards him a divorce and his wife a decree of separate maintenance and which further provides that appellant shall pay $400 per month for respondent's support and maintenance.
Appellant contends that the evidence was insufficient to support the decree of separate maintenance or the alimony award; that respondent’s attorney improperly resorted to leading questions at the trial; and that the court erred in granting both an interlocutory judgment of divorce to appellant and a decree of separate maintenance to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- De Burgh v. De BurghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Hall v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- White v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Reid v. Valley Restaurants, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1957
- Latky v. WolfeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Elam v. ElamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Evans v. EvansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969