Legal Opinion

Maccabee v. Lipman

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1946PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMichael F. Walsh, J.

This is a motion to change the venue of this action from Kings County to Dutchess County pursuant to section 183 of the Civil Practice Act and rule 146 of the Rules of Civil Practice, on the ground that this action is to “ recover or to procure a judgment establishing * * * a lien or other interest in real property in Dutchess County.” Plaintiff is suing to rescind a written executory contract to purchase real property, for a lien on said premises for the down payment and expenses, and for a judgment of $1,500 and interest. Plaintiff is not seeking a judgment involving a change in the title…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hogg v. MackNew York Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Nassau Hotel Co. v. BarnettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  3. Birmingham v. SquiresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  4. Maier v. RebstockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Grace v. Deepdale Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
  2. McNamara Realty, Inc. v. HutchinsonNew York Supreme Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API