Legal Opinion
McNamara Realty, Inc. v. Hutchinson
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 4, 1967PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtLawrence H. Cooke, J.
In this action for the recovery of real estate commissions, defendants move, pursuant to CPLR 503 (subd. [a]), 507, 510 and 511, to change the place of trial from Schenectady to Albany County on the grounds that plaintiff has an office in the latter, that defendants reside therein and that. “ the real property, which is the subject of this action,” is situated therein.
The rule regarding domestic corporations codified by CPLR 503 (subd. [c]) is that for venue purposes a domestic corporation is deemed a resident of the county in which its principal office is located and this means the county…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hogg v. MackNew York Supreme Court · 1889
- Nassau Hotel Co. v. BarnettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
- Maier v. RebstockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
- Yonkers Raceway, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of PittsburghNew York Supreme Court · 1957
- Becker v. Town of Cherry CreekNew York Supreme Court · 1893
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Carlton Group, Ltd. v. Property Markets Group, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015