Legal Opinion

Merchants Mutual Casualty Co. v. Robert Pinard

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided February 4, 1936PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The master was warranted in finding a conditional sale of the automobile. The insured testified that he sold it and had nothing to do with it after the sale. There was other evidence tending to show that he gave up possession and control when he sold. If a contract other than one of such a sale might have been found, the evidence did not compel the trier thus to find. The circumstances claimed to disprove a conditional sale are not conclusive to such effect.

The insured retaining title only for security (Mercier v. Company, 84 N. H. 59, 63, 64), the accident is not within the coverage of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mercier v. Nashua Buick Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1929

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Home Indemnity Co. v. BowersTennessee Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Employers Liability Assurance Corp. v. SweattSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1948
  3. Olin Mathieson Chemical Corp. v. Southwest Casualty Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1957
  4. Employers Liability Assurance Corp. v. Maguire, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1948
  5. Merchants Mutual Insurance v. SimoneauSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API