Legal Opinion

Merchants Mutual Insurance v. Simoneau

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided November 30, 1973No. 5974PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.

By this petition for declaratoryjudgment (RSA 491:22), the plaintiff insurer seeks a decree that it is not obligated to defend actions for personal injury and for wrongful death or satisfy any judgments arising out of a 1966 accident involving an automobile insured by the company under a policy issued to the defendant Simoneau. The defendant Gerard Hegarty was operating the automobile when the accident occurred. The Superior Court (Dunfey, J.), after trial without jury, ruled that the plaintiff is obligated to defend the pending law actions, and reserved and transferred plaintiff’s exceptions…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Didlake v. Standard Ins. CoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
  2. General Insurance Company of America, and Interveners, Sherman L. Jones v. Western Fire & Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  3. Howe v. HoweSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1935
  4. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. v. HopkinsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1965
  5. Employers Liability Assurance Corp. v. SweattSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1948

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sylvain v. HendersonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
  2. Cournoyer v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API