Legal Opinion

Hall v. Palmetto Enterprises II, Inc.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided June 1, 1984No. 0189PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Goolsby, Judge:

The respondent Bruce Hall brought this action against the appellant Palmetto Enterprises II, Inc., to recover damages for personal injuries sustained while helping an employee of Palmetto load a pinball machine onto a truck. The appeal involves questions concerning the admissibility of certain testimony, the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict and its amount, the argument by Hall’s counsel to the jury, and the trial court’s jury instructions. We find no error; consequently, we affirm the jury’s verdict in Hall’s favor in the amount of $5,625.

Palmetto furnished…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Mickle v. BlackmonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
  2. Baker v. WeaverCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1983
  3. Cudd v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1983
  4. Gasque v. Heublein, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  5. Patania v. SilverstoneCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Seaside Resorts, Inc. v. Club Car, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1992
  2. Hall v. PALMETTO ENTR. II, INC., OF CLINTONCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API