Legal Opinion

Gasque v. Heublein, Inc.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided April 9, 1984No. 0143PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gardner, Judge:

This appeal is from a $750,000 j ury verdict rendered in favor of the respondent, Wayne D. Gasque, in a products liability action. We affirm.

Respondent Gasque sustained permanent loss of vision in his left eye when he was struck by the stopper and cork assembly of a bottle of Jacques Bonet Cold Duck sparkling wine. The stopper allegedly ejected prematurely when Gasque’s friend was twisting the wire retaining hood.

Respondent brought suit against appellants, Heublein, Inc., Heublein Allied Vintners, Inc., and United Vintners, Inc., (HEUBLEIN), manufacturers-bottlers of Jacques…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Victor Bevevino v. M. S. SaydjariCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  2. Mickle v. BlackmonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
  3. Nienow v. NienowSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
  4. Charles v. Texas Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
  5. Anderson Ex Rel. Estate of Anderson v. WestSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Bragg v. Hi-Ranger, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
  2. Madden v. CoxCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  3. Branham v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  4. Clark v. RossCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  5. Bonaparte v. FloydCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API