Insurance Company of North America v. Williams
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
HARWOOD, Justice.
The majority opinion of the Court of Appeals while stating that the accidental death benefit coverage was in both of the automobile polices, yet proceeds to treat such provisions as a separate and distinct type of insurance, as though it was not in the automobile policies.
The fallacy of this reasoning is that the accidental death coverage arises solely from the policies of automobile insurance.- The liability of the insurer must be determined by the provisions of the automobile policies.
■ In his dissenting opinion Judge Cates states that, “No separate premium is shown to have…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Government Employees Insurance Company v. SweetDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- Central Mutual Insurance Co. v. RoyalSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
- Woodall v. National Life and Accident Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1959
3Cited by5 opinions
- Alabama Farm Bureau Mutual Casualty Insurance v. PrestonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
- Cheek v. VULCAN LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE CO.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1973
- COTTON STATES LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. KnowlesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1970
- Alabama Farm Bureau Mutual Casualty Insurance v. PrestonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
- Insurance Co. of North America v. WilliamsAlabama Court of Appeals · 1968