Legal Opinion

Jones v. Herrick

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1903No. 4848PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motions to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Tallman, J., and to strike briefs. Also, motion to strike statement of facts.

1Opinion of the CourtDunbar, J.

Respondents interpose four motions in this case: (1) to dismiss the appeal, (2) to strike the statement of facts, (3) to strike the exhibits attached to the transcript, and (4) to strike the briefs and affirm the decree.

The motion to dismiss the appeal is based upon the defective affidavit of the sureties, of which the following is a copy:

“State of Washington, County of King.—ss.
“John P. Jacobson and William Thaanum, upon their oaths does depose and say, each for himself and not for the *198other, that he is worth the sum of two hundred ($200) dollars in property in the State of Washington, not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. SeatonWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Wollin v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  3. State v. LandesWashington Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Martin v. NicholsWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Russell v. MitchellWashington Supreme Court · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API