Legal Opinion

Walsh Construction Co. v. Mutual of Enumclaw

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 10, 2003No. 0104-03398; A117368PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

Plaintiff Walsh Construction Company (WCC) appeals from a judgment for defendant Mutual of Enumclaw on plaintiffs claim for breach of an insurance contract. As described below, we conclude that, because of the operation of ORS 30.140(1), defendant had no duty either to defend or to indemnify plaintiff. Accordingly, we affirm.

The material facts are not in dispute. Plaintiff, a general contractor, entered into an agreement with a subcontractor, Ron Rust Drywall, Inc. (Rust), to work on a remodeling job. The subcontract agreement between plaintiff and Rust obligated Rust to procure liability…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Zettel v. Paschen Contractors, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  3. Montgomery Elevator Co. v. Tuality Community Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Walsh Construction Co. v. Mutual of EnumclawOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Montara Owners Ass'n v. La Noue Development, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  3. Sunset Presbyterian Church v. Andersen Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. Portland General Electric Co. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2015
  5. First Mercury Insurance v. Westchester Surplus Lines Ins.District Court, D. Oregon · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API