Legal Opinion

First Mercury Insurance v. Westchester Surplus Lines Ins.

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided January 27, 2016No. Case No. 3:15-cv-00192-MOPublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

MOSMAN, United'States District Judge

First Mercury moves for partial summary judgment' on the basis that it has no responsibility for ZellComp’s liability. Westchester has joined in First Mercury’s motion. AIG, an intervener in the action, moved similarly for summary judgment and a declaration that it has no requirement to indemnify Multnomah County. Multnomah County moved for Summary Judgment seeking a judgment that First Mercury; Westchester, and AIG owe Mult-nomah County coverage for the liability ZellComp incurred in the state law suit. For the reasons set forth below I…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Brinson v. Linda Rose Joint VentureCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. Montara Owners Assn. v. La Noue Development, LLCOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Coneff v. AT & T CORP.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API