Legal Opinion

Walsh Construction Co. v. Mutual of Enumclaw

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 2005No. CC 0104-03398; CA A117368; SC S51104PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarson, C. J.

This action for breach of an insurance contract involves the meaning of ORS 30.140(1). That statute prohibits construction agreements from requiring a person or that person’s insurer to indemnify another party against liability caused in whole or in part by the indemnitee’s negligence. The question on review is whether that prohibition extends to an additional insured endorsement that plaintiff Walsh Construction Co. (Walsh) obtained from a subcontractor on a policy that defendant Mutual of Enumclaw (Enumclaw) had issued to the subcontractor. Both the trial court and the Court of Appeals…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Krieger v. JustOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Finney v. BransomOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Montgomery Elevator Co. v. Tuality Community Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  5. Walsh Construction Co. v. Mutual of EnumclawCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Montara Owners Assn. v. La Noue Development, LLCOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Karjalainen v. Curtis Johnston & Pennywise, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  3. State v. Rodriguez-BarreraCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  4. Clarendon National Insurance v. American States InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2010
  5. Montara Owners Ass'n v. La Noue Development, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API