Legal Opinion

Bellemar Parts Industries, Inc. v. Tracy

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 2000No. 98-2516PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCook, J.

BPI’s claim for a refund rests upon two sales tax exceptions: the resale exception set forth in R.C. 5739.01(E)(1) and the manufacturing exception contained in (E)(9) of that section; Because we conclude that neither exception applies to BPI’s purchase of employment services, we reverse the decision of the BTA.

I

BPI first argues that the purchase of employment services is excepted from sales tax under the resale exception. That exception, as set forth in R.C. 5739.01(E)(1), excludes from sales tax any transaction “in which the purpose of the consumer is (1) [t]o resell the thing transferred or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hyatt Corp. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. CCH Computax, Inc. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1993

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cousino Construction Co. v. WilkinsOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Corporate Staffing Resources, Inc. v. ZainoOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Crew 4 You, Inc. v. WilkinsOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State ex rel. Cordray v. Court of ClaimsOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Bellemar Parts Industries, Inc. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API