Legal Opinion

Hyatt Corp. v. Limbach

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1994No. 93-445PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

We conclude that the BTA’s decision was reasonable and lawful and affirm it.

R.C. 5739.02 levies the sales tax on every retail sale made in Ohio. R.C. 5739.01(E)(1) provides:

“ ‘Retail sale’ and ‘sales at retail’ include all sales except those in which the purpose of the consumer is:
*539“(1) To resell the thing transferred or benefit of the service provided, by a person engaging in business, in the form in which the same is, or is to be, received by him[.]” (Emphasis added.)

R.C. 5739.01(B)(2) defines “sale” and “selling” to include “[a]U transactions by which lodging by a hotel is or is to be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Coca-Cola Bottling Corp. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. G & J Pepsi Cola Bottling, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. CCH Computax, Inc. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1993

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bellemar Parts Industries, Inc. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Cincinnati Reds, L.L.C. v. Testa (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Corporate Staffing Resources, Inc. v. ZainoOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Crew 4 You, Inc. v. WilkinsOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Bellemar Parts Industries, Inc. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API