Legal Opinion

Swift, Susan v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided February 11, 2003No. 01-5312PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge RANDOLPH.

RANDOLPH, Circuit Judge:

On January 19, 1999, Susan Swift, a Department of Justice attorney employee, brought a qui tam action against one employee and two former employees of the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel, claiming that in 1992 and thereafter they had conspired to defraud the government, in violation of the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)(3). For reasons unnecessary to recount, one of the defendants was dropped from the case. Swift alleged that the remaining two defendants had also violated 31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)(1)…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. United States v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Ex Rel. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Rinaldi v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. United States v. Fokker Services B.V.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
  2. Hoyte v. American National Red CrossCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
  3. Secretary of Labor v. Twentymile Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
  4. Ridenour v. Kaiser-Hill Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  5. International Game Technology, Inc. v. Second Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada Ex Rel. County of WashoeNevada Supreme Court · 2006

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API