Gilbert v. Miller
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
These actions were instituted to recover upon two promissory notes, each for the sum of $750, one executed by the defendant Miller and the other executed by the defendant Baird, in favor of the Oak Forest Development Association, a corporation. Judgment went for the defendants in each action, and plaintiffs appeal therefrom. There is practically no dispute as. to the facts of the case. They are substantially as follows: The plaintiffs claimed that said association' was indebted to them in the sum of $1,500 for legal services performed by them for said association. They demanded a settlement…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Giselman v. StarrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Read v. BuffumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Gushee v. LeavittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1855
- Bovard v. DickensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Buena Vista Oil Co. v. Park Bk. of L. A.California Court of Appeal · 1919
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Walsh v. American Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
- Appling v. Minarets & Western Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929