Legal Opinion

City of Redondo Beach v. Kumnick

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 5, 1963No. Civ. 26817PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.

The City of Redondo Beach filed an action in eminent domain involving property owned by defendant Guarino, appellant herein; while other answering defendants were represented by counsel, Guarino appeared in propria persona. On November 28, 1961, counsel for defendant Kumnick, the city attorney, and defendant Guarino demanded a trial by jury (joint pretrial statement, p. 2[1] • pretrial conference order, p. 2), and accordingly the cause was set for a jury trial on January 22, 1962 (notice of trial). On that day Guarino appeared; after the case was called for trial, the following colloquy took…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Parker v. James Granger, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Craig v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. San Bernardino Investment Co. v. MerrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Ford v. Palisades Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. Gardner v. ShreveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Old Republic Insurance v. FSR Brokerage, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000
  2. Costa Mesa Union Sch. Dist. of Orange Cty. v. SEC. First Nat'l BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. De Castro v. RoweCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Turlock Golf & County Club v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Escamilla v. California Insurance Guarantee Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API