Legal Opinion
Youngs v. Industrial Claim Appeals office
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided May 10, 2012No. 11CA1259PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge HAWTHORNE.
T1 In this workers' compensation action, Patrick Youngs and his counsel, Chris For-syth (collectively appellants), seek review of the final order entered by the Industrial Claim Appeals Office (Panel) affirming the administrative law judge's (ALJ's) order assessing Pinnacol Assurance's 1 attorney fees and costs against Mr. Forsyth, individually, because appellants requested a hearing on an issue which was not ripe for adjudication in violation of section 8-48-211(2)(d), C.R.S. 2011, We perceive no basis for disturbing the Panel's ruling and therefore affirm.
12 This…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Brodeur v. American Home Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2007
- Bebo Construction Co. v. Mattox & O'Brien, P.C.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1999
- Davison v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- Pham v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2003
- Giampapa v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2003
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Williams v. Department of Public SafetyColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
- 85 Sanchez v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2017
- Kilpatrick v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
- Youngs v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
- Windows v. ICAOColorado Court of Appeals · 2020
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.