Legal Opinion
In re Bushey
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided April 16, 1895PublishedCited by 11 opinions
Habeas corpus. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
Petitioner was convicted in the police *65court of the city of Detroit upon a complaint which charged that—
“On the 14th day of January, A. D. 1895, at the city of Detroit aforesaid, one Ellen Bushey was and is a disorderly person, for that the said defendant then and there wras making and assisting in making a noise, disturbance, and improper diversion, by which the peace and good order of the neighborhood were disturbed,” etc.
The petitioner is now confined in the Detroit House of Correction. A hearing has been had on petition for habeas corpus.
Section 10, Act No. 161, Laws of 1885, provides:
“The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Brown v. BuckMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Taggart v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Curbay v. BellemerMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by11 opinions
- Detroit Police Officers Ass'n. v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. BuckleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
- Washtenaw County Road Commissioners v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- In re JosephMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Braffett v. BraffettMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.