Legal Opinion

O'LEARY v. James & Wunderlich

District Court, D. Montana

Decided January 22, 1960No. 9:19-mcr-00006PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMESON, District Judge.

The defendants Guy H. James Construction Company and Wunderlich Contracting Company have moved the court, pursuant to Rule 50(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., for judgment in accordance with their motion for a directed verdict at the close of all the evidence. The case was tried before a jury, but no verdict was returned. Counsel for the respective parties have filed briefs, and oral argument was presented to the court on December 9, 1959.

Cause No. 2006 is prosecuted by Louise J. O’Leary, as widow and guardian of the minor children of Michael D.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United New York & New Jersey Sandy Hook Pilots Ass'n v. HaleckiSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. West v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Ulmen v. SchwiegerMontana Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Bergquist v. PentermanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  5. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. BellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Maguire v. Hilton Hotels Corp.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Otts v. BroughIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Shannon v. Howard S. Wright Const. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State Ex Rel. Great Falls National Bank v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Donch v. Delta Inspection Services, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API