Legal Opinion

Ford v. Jones

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided December 16, 1927PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Drury, Commissioner

Reversing.

The appellees, whom we shall refer to as the plaintiffs, started this litigation for the purpose of compelling the defendant, L. C. Ford, to accept a deed they had made and tendered to him in consummation of a contract they had with him. Plaintiffs were successful, and Ford has appealed.

There is no dispute about the contract whatever. The defendant admits that the deed tendered fully complies with the contract in other respects, but he has declined to accept it, because it does not, as he claims, convey him good title for the simple reason…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ebey v. AdamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Birney v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1837
  3. Grimmer v. FriederichIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Lindenberger v. CornellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  5. Potter v. PotterIllinois Supreme Court · 1922

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Moore v. MoyleIllinois Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Skiles v. Bowling Green Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
  3. Wilkes v. WilkesTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Fischer v. PorterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
  5. Graham v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1965

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API