Legal Opinion

Birney v. Richardson

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 6, 1837PublishedCited by 36 opinions

Detinue. From the Circuit Court for Mercer Counts.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Robertson

Judge Marshall did not sit in this case.

This appeal is prosecuted for reversing a judgment in detinue, obtained by the appellees, Landie Richardson and Elizabeth Ford, as the surviving legatees of Thomas Richardson, their deceased father, against James Birney, the surviving husband of one of the deceased co-legatees, whom he married, in the year 1800, and who died in 1834, about a year prior to the commencement of this action, for fifteen slaves, fourteen of whom are the children and grand-children of the fifteenth, named Esther; who was the property of the testator, and who, then childless,…

2Cited by36 opinions

  1. Harvey v. BellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
  2. Meacham v. GrahamTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Wills v. WillsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1887
  4. Thackston v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1886
  5. Ford v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API