Legal Opinion

United States v. Monghur

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 4, 2009No. 08-10351PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION

ORDER

The opinion filed August 11, 2009, is hereby amended. The amended opinion is attached hereto.

With this amendment, the panel unanimously has voted to deny Appellant’s petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc.

The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35.

Accordingly, the petition for panel rehearing is DENIED and the petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED. No further petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc may be filed.

OPINI…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Winston v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jeffrey Howard VAN POYCK, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  5. United States v. Jairo Cardona-Rivera and Gustavo Luna SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. Song Ja ChaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. United States v. ApodacaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  3. People v. DavisSupreme Court of Colorado · 2019
  4. Dunham v. Kootenai CountyDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2010
  5. United States v. KitzhaberCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API