Legal Opinion
United States v. Apodaca
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 21, 2017No. Criminal No. 2014-0057PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BERYL A. HOWELL, Chief Judge
The government seeks enforcement of two administrative subpoenas issued by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) demanding production of the jail calls of the defendants Agustín Flores Apodaca and Panfilo Flores Apodaca recorded by the D.C. Department of Corrections (“DOC”). See Gov’t’s Mot. Release Defs.’ Jail Calls (“Gov’t’s Mot.”) at 1-2, ECF No. 23. After receiving the administrative subpoenas, DOC’s General Counsel delivered the recordings on two CDs to the Court, along with a letter describing the circumstances in which the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. ApodacaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- In re Grand Jury Investigation of Possible Violations of 18 U.S.C. § 1956 and 50 U.S.C. § 1705Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- United States v. HillCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Bahman Group v. GackiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- Jones v. Vintage Equity Group, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.