Wiest v. Wiegele
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Mark P. Painter, Judge.
{¶ 1} This case is a civil-procedure nightmare. An amended complaint was not answered. Judgment was contested before being entered. The trial court denied a motion for relief from judgment, then granted a motion for relief from judgment, then vacated that judgment, and then granted it again — -though the last three times it had no jurisdiction. An appeal was filed without a stay, and the plaintiff then got the money.
{¶ 2} With our decision today, this case is finally over. But then, we thought that last time.
I. The Launch into a Procedural Abyss
{¶ 3} In September 2004,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Nolan v. NolanOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Blodgett v. BlodgettOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State ex rel. Potain v. MathewsOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- Lynch v. Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1927
3Cited by21 opinions
- O'Donnell v. N.E. Ohio Neighborhood Health Servs., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
- Art's Rental Equip., Inc. v. Bear Creek Constr., L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012
- Ma v. GomezOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
- Cleveland v. Embassy Realty Invests., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
- Carlson v. CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.