Idaho State Bar v. Everard
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
EISMANN, Justice.
After the appellant was disbarred in the State of Washington, the Idaho State Bar instituted reciprocal disciplinary proceedings. The appellant contended that alleged procedural irregularities in the Washington disciplinary proceedings deprived him of due process. The Idaho Professional Conduct Board found that the appellant had not been deprived of due process in Washington and recommended a reciprocal sanction of a 180-day suspension from the practice of law to run concurrently with the disbarment imposed in Washington. We affirm the findings of the Professional Conduct…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- University of Tennessee v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hortonville Joint School District No. 1 v. Hortonville Education Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. WhiteheadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Idaho State Bar v. ClarkIdaho Supreme Court · 2012