State ex rel. Galbraith v. Superior Court
Washington Supreme Court
Certiorari to review an order of the superior court for Spokane county, Hinkle, J., entered April 39, 1910, adjudging a public use and necessity in condemnation proceedings by an irrigation company.
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
The respondent Spokane Valley Land & Water Company, which we will hereafter call the company, commenced eminent domain proceedings in the superior court for Spokane county to acquire a right of way over land of the relators for the purpose of a canal to carry water to and irrigate land belonging to it. The cause came on for hearing before the court upon the questions of public use and necessity, when the court, after the introduction of evidence and argument of counsel upon those questions, adjudged that the proposed use was public and that the right of way sought to be acquired was necessary…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Clark v. NashSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Nash v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 1904
- Oury v. GoodwinArizona Supreme Court · 1891
- Ellinghouse v. TaylorMontana Supreme Court · 1897
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hallauer v. Spectrum Properties, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
- Hallauer v. Spectrum Properties, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
- Grover Irrigation & Land Co. v. Lovella Ditch, Reservoir & Irrigation Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1913
- Smith v. CameronOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- State Ex Rel. Chelan Electric Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1927
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.