Legal Opinion

Hallauer v. Spectrum Properties, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 2001No. 68554-1PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, J.

Wilbur G. and Josephine Hallauer, who hold a certificated water right to water from a spring on neighboring land, seek to condemn a way across that land for transporting water to their property for domestic use and to ponds for fish propagation. The Court of Appeals held that because the Hallauers’ property is not landlocked and alternative sources of water are available, the Hallauers failed to prove a reasonable necessity for condemnation. We reverse the Court of Appeals and hold that the Hallauers are entitled to proceed with their condemnation action.

FACTS

The Hallauers and respondents…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. State v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Havens v. C & D PLASTICS, INC.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Clark v. NashSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Tunstall v. BergesonWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Miller v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1963

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Carlton v. BlackWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. In Re Estate of BlackWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Jongeward v. BNSF Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Hallauer v. Spectrum Properties, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. HirschfelderWashington Supreme Court · 2010

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API