Castillo v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ODOM, Judge.
This is an appeal from a conviction for injury to a child. V.T.C.A., Penal Code Sec. 22.04. Punishment was assessed at imprisonment for twenty years.
Appellant first contends that the instant indictment was fundamentally defective in that it failed to allege that he committed the offense “by act” or “omission” as prescribed by the statute. 1 We must reject this contention.
The indictment alleged that appellant engaged in conduct that caused serious bodily injury to a child. “Conduct” includes “an act or omission.” See V.T.C.A., Penal Code Sec. 1.07(a)(8). Hence the allegation…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- North Carolina v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Fare v. Michael C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Tague v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Russell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Bush v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Port v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Brunson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Gately v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2010
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.