Legal Opinion

Hammond v. . Schiff

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1888PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Verdict and judgment for plaintiffs. Defendants appealed.

The plaintiffs, as tenants under a lease from John H. McAden, the owner, were in the occupation of a house and lot fronting on Trade Street in Charlotte, pursuing a mercantile business, in the year 1885, while the defendants, similarly engaged, were early in that year in possession of an adjoining lot with like frontage, under a contract of purchase made on 1 July, 1875, with Henry W. Fries, the building on which was consumed by fire in the month of February, 1885.

While the lots belonging, respectively, to said McAden and Fries, to wit:…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Barnhardt v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  2. Hunt v. EureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. State v. Ledford.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  4. Cunningham v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  5. Smiley v. . PearceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mathews v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  2. Jeffords v. Florence CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
  3. Karsten v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of the Mid-Atlantic States, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1992
  4. Jeffords v. Florence CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API