Legal Opinion

Karsten v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of the Mid-Atlantic States, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided December 21, 1992No. Civ. A. 92-554-APublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CACHERIS, Chief Judge.

At issue is whether under Virginia law the collateral source rule 1 allows a plaintiff to recover compensatory damages for medical bills previously satisfied by her health maintenance organization (“HMO”), whom she has successfully sued for medical malpractice. For reasons discussed herein, this Court finds that the collateral source rule applies so that plaintiff may receive compensatory damages for medical bills already paid according to her HMO contract, where that same HMO is also liable as the tortfeasor. 2

Plaintiff, Frances T. Karsten (“Karsten”),…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Railroad Co. v. KoontzSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. The "Atlas."Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. United States v. William H. Price, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961
  5. Bulala v. BoydSupreme Court of Virginia · 1990

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Frances T. Karsten v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of the Mid-Atlantic States, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
  2. Murphy v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1993
  3. Ditkoff v. LarsonFairfax County Circuit Court · 1994
  4. Lagerstrom v. Myrtle Werth Hospital-Mayo Health SystemWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Lagerstrom v. Myrtle Werth Hospital-Mayo Health SystemWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API