Legal Opinion

City of Caruthersville v. Faris

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 14, 1940PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTatlow, P. J.

This is a condemnation proceeding seeking to condemn land to enlarge a cemetery.

The petition has two prongs; that is, it presents two separate and perhaps inconsistent theories. The six individual plaintiffs seek to condemn the land under the power of eminent domain, which they claim is conferred upon them by section 14066, Revised Statutes 1929, as representatives of the public, to enlarge a public cemetery. The City of Caruthersville seeks to condemn the land under the power of eminent domain, which it claims is conferred upon it under Section ,6852, Revised Statutes 1929, relating to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mason v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Mid-Northern Oil Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Wooldridge v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  4. State v. EckhardtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  5. Fore v. HokeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1892

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Obetz v. Boatmen's Nat. Bank of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  2. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. NewinghamMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
  3. Bertagnoli v. BakerUtah Supreme Court · 1950
  4. STATE ex rel. Fugatt v. HawkinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954
  5. Faris v. City of CaruthersvilleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API