Legal Opinion

Fore v. Hoke

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 16, 1892PublishedCited by 10 opinions

.Error to the Phelps Circuit Court. — Hon.. C. C. Bland, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

This was an original proceeding in the circuit court of Phelps county, under section 939,' -of the Revised Statutes of 1889, to enlarge a public burial ground. The petition ¡( omitting the caption) was .as follows:

“Your petitioners, Benj. Pore, Wm. Pore, W. H. Pore, John Earpe and W. M. Stogsdill respectfully :state that the following described real estate, situated •on the southeast quarter of the northwest quarter of *256section twenty-seven (27), in township thirty-six (36), of range eight (8), west in Phelps county, Missouri, and inclosed within the following metes and bounds, to-wit:…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Johnson v. BeazleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  2. Ells v. Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  3. Kansas City, St. Joseph & Council Bluffs R. R. v. Campbell, Nelson & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  4. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. YoungSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
  5. Pulaski County v. Stuart, Buchanan & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1877

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. City of Tarkio v. ClarkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
  2. R. R. v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  3. City of Caruthersville v. FarisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1940
  4. Richter v. RodgersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  5. Johnson City Southern Railway Co. v. South & Western RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API