Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Newingham
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
'RUARK, Presiding Justice.
This case involves the question of wheth-er or not a telephone company may condemn for the purpose of laying underground cables. The Southwestern Bell Telephone Company (hereinafter referred to as the ■Company) filed petition against Newingham and others (hereinafter called Owners) to appropriate an easement one rod in width ■across Owners’ land in order to construct, •operate and maintain an underground communications system, consisting of underground cables, wires, conduits, and other necessary appurtenances below the surface, with right to clear and maintain the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Cummins v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933
- Christy v. PetrusSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
- Julia Building Ass'n v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1885
- State v. KempSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
- Fleming v. Moore Brothers Realty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Lebeau v. KellyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- Duckworth v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1970
- State Ex Rel. Schwab v. RileySupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
- Haywood v. FowlerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
- State Ex Rel. Missouri Cities Water Co. v. HodgeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.