Green v. Layton
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOSK, J.
In a number of recent decisions, the United States Supreme Court and this court have held that a statute which requires a candidate for public office to pay a filing fee as the exclusive means of securing a place on an election ballot violates the equal protection clause of the United States Constitution and that some reasonable alternative means of access to the ballot must be provided. (Lubin v. Panish (1974) 415 U.S. 709 [39 L.Ed.2d 702, 94 S.Ct. 1315]; Bullock v. Carter (1972) 405 U.S. 134 [31 L.Ed.2d 92, 92 S.Ct. 849]; Knoll v. Davidson (1974) 12 Cal.3d 335, 345-349 [116…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bullock v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Lubin v. PanishSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Zeilenga v. NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Knoll v. DavidsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Board of Education v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Younger v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Fields v. EuCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Choudhry v. FreeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Unger v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- John A. v. San Bernardino City Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.