Legal Opinion

Barrett v. Fritz

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1969No. 41620PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Solfisburg

Plaintiff, Jamee H. Barrett, sued for personal injuries sustained on a golf course when struck by a ball hit by defendant Edward Fritz. In that negligence action the circuit court of Cook County instructed the jury on assumption of risk, and entered judgment on the jury verdict in favor of defendant. The appellate court, on plaintiff’s appeal, reversed and remanded the cause for a new trial (98 Ill. App. 2d 75), and we granted defendant leave to appeal.

The issues are whether the defense of assumption of risk is available in a negligence action where there is no employment or contractual…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Felgner v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  2. B. Shoninger Co. v. MannIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  3. McGrath v. American Cyanamid Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
  4. Sweeney v. MatthewsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968
  5. Campion v. Chicago Landscape Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1938

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. People v. CaballeroIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Brown v. Decatur Memorial HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Court v. GrzelinskiIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Delany v. BadameIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Sweeney v. Max A. R. Matthews & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1970

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API