Legal Opinion

Harris v. . Board of Education

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 20, 1940PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchencK, J.

It is tbe contention of tbe defendants tbat tbe provision of C. S., 515, tbat “witbin ten days after tbe receipt of tbe certificate from tbe Supreme Court, if there is an appeal, if the demurrer is sustained tbe plaintiff may move, upon three days notice, for leave to amend tbe complaint,” made it necessary for tbe plaintiffs to give three days written notice (C. S., 914) of their intention to lodge'tbeir motion to file additional or amended complaint.

With tbe contention of tbe defendants we cannot concur. Tbe permissive right given tbe plaintiffs by tbe statute does not deprive them of tbe…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Coor v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  2. Jones v. . JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  3. Wooten v. S. R. Biggs Drug Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  4. Carolina Hardware Co. v. Raleigh Banking & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  5. Hemphill v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Collins v. North Carolina State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Hagins v. Redevelopment Commission of GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  3. Mills v. RichardsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Hardware Dealers Mutual Fire Insurance v. SheekSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. In Re Applications for Reassignment BoydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API