Legal Opinion

Hemphill v. . Moore

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1889PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

At the appearance term of the court the plaintiff filed his complaint and the defendant filed her answer thereto, and an order of reference was entered. At the next succeeding term, in the course of the action, the plaintiff, in open court, moved, upon affidavit, deemed pertinent and sufficient, for an injunction. One of the counsel of the defendant appeared and opposed the motion.

The following is the material part of the case settled on appeal:

"Counsel for the defendant voluntarily entered an appearance for the purpose of resisting the motion for an order restraining the defendant until the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Governor Ex. Rel. Trustees of University of N. C. v. LassiterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
  2. State v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  3. Stith v. . JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  4. Jones v. . JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  5. Harper v. . SuggSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Collins v. North Carolina State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Harris v. . Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Killian v. Maiden Chair Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  4. Danielson v. CummingsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API