Legal Opinion
Crocker v. Weil
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided May 17, 1961PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.
The named parties appear in a representative capacity only. The real disputants are the Bakery and Confectionery Workers’ International Union of America and its formerly affiliated Portland Local No. 364. Plaintiff Crocker is the officially designated representative of the international union. Plaintiff Boster is alleged to be representative of any members who remained loyal to the former affiliation with the international union. When we use the word “plaintiff” we will refer to Crocker only. Defendants Weil and Van Cleve are officers of the local union. They appear as representatives of all…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Prime v. PrimeOregon Supreme Court · 1943
- Bradley v. O'HareAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
- Locals 1140 & 1145, United Electrical, Radio & MacHine Workers of America v. United Electrical, Radio & MacHine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Alvino v. CarraccioSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Johnson v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
- International Brotherhood of Pulp, Sulphite and Paper Mill Workers v. DelaneyWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- Trachsel v. BarneyOregon Supreme Court · 1972
- Johnson v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
- Kotan v. SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 110CCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.