Legal Opinion

Estate of Hanley v. Hanley

California Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1943No. L. A. 18316Published

1Opinion of the Court

23 Cal.2d 120 (1943)

Estate of KATE HANLEY, Deceased. KATHARINE G. HANLEY, Appellant,

v.

KATHARINE G. HANLEY, as Executrix, etc., et al., Respondents.

L. A. No. 18316.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

Oct. 29, 1943.

Laurence B. Martin and Samuel Reisman for Appellant.

F. C. Stevens and Olson & Ahlport for Respondents.

EDMONDS, J.

The First Account and Report in the administration of the estate of Kate Hanley was approved by an order filed on December 12, 1941. A notice of appeal was filed by Katharine G. Hanley, who, the court determined by the order, does not own money inventoried as property of…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Estate of Hanley v. HanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Duncan v. RamishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Urtz v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
  4. Leese v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  5. People v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API