Legal Opinion

Lilienthal v. Herren

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1906No. 6040PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Linn, J., entered July 25, 1905, upon the special verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the defendant, and in favor of the plaintiffs for a sum admitted to be due by direction of the court, in an action on a contract.

1Opinion of the CourtMount, C. J.

— This action was brought by the appellants, plaintiffs below, to recover damages against respondent for an alleged breach of a written contract. The complaint sets out the contract, by the terms of which respondent agreed to sell and deliver to the appellants twenty thousand pounds of hops, for an agreed price of fifteen cents per pound, to. be grown in the year 1901 on a certain farm containing’ three hundred and twenty acres of land, and agreed to advance, to respondent $600 at the date of the contract, and $1,000 mora at picking season. The complaint than alleged, that appellants advanced…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hubenthal v. Spokane & Inland Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Conta v. CorgiatWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Hobson v. Union Oil Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Sauers v. Mutual Benefit Health Acc. Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Fiorito v. Clyde Equipment Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API