Legal Opinion

Buddenberg v. Southcoast Lumber

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1993No. WCB 89-19242; CA A68896; SC S39328PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

In this workers’ compensation case, the issue is whether the Director of the Department of Insurance and Finance (the Director) exceeded his statutory authority in the adoption of certain standards for the evaluation of permanent partial disability. We conclude that the Director did not exceed his authority in the manner urged by claimant.

Before 1987, the rating of extent of disability under the workers’ compensation laws was carried out on an ad hoc basis. The Director had promulgated “guidelines” for the rating of the extent of various kinds of disability, but the Court of Appeals had held…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Harwell v. Argonaut InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Matter of Compensation of FraijoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  3. Buddenberg v. Southcoast LumberCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mastriano v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Cole v. Sunnyside Marketplace, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  3. Morales v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Morales v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  5. Nero v. City of TualatinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API