Legal Opinion
Elam v. Montgomery County
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided May 11, 1983No. C-3-82-182PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY ON PENDING MOTIONS; PLAINTIFF’S PARTIAL MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OVERRULED; DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SUSTAINED IN PART AND OVERRULED IN PART; NEW TRIAL DATE SET
RICE, District Judge.
This matter involves an action by Plaintiff Ralph Elam, under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, 1 against several Defendants, for an alleged deprivation of his federal constitutional right to retain custody of his minor child. Both Plaintiff (Doc. # 8) and Defendants (Doc. # 10) have moved for summary judgment, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. For the reasons set out below, Plaintiff’s motion is…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Hooks v. HooksCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Johnson v. City of Erie, Pa.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- Williams v. Dayton Police DepartmentDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1987
- McArthur v. BellDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1992
- Walter J. Drewes, Cross-Appellant v. Brenda B. Ilnicki, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.