Legal Opinion

Sheafe v. Hastie

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1897No. 2476PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County.—Hon. T. J. Humes, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dunbar, J.

The respondent, as receiver of the-Washington Savings Bank, sued appellant on two-promissory notes, aggregating $400, with accumulated interest. Appellant demurred to the complaint; but, without setting out the complaint or discussing it further, we think the allegations therein were sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and that the demurrer was properly overruled.

As an affirmative defense and counterclaim or set-*565off, the appellant alleged that at divers and sundry times he had performed services as an attorney for the plaintiff…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Shelton v. ConantWashington Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Topline Equipment, Inc. v. Stan Witty Land, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1982
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Grays Harbor CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Panchot v. LeetMontana Supreme Court · 1915
  4. North Side State Bank v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Warren, Little & Lund, Inc. v. Max J. Kuney Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API