Legal Opinion
(PS) Gigena v. Finch
District Court, E.D. California
Decided August 8, 2023No. 2:23-cv-01234Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GABRIEL GIGENA, 2:23-cv-01234 DAD CKD (PS) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND 14 RICK FINCH, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff’s pro se complaint filed on June 27, 2023, is before the court for screening. (ECF 18 No. 1.)1 Plaintiff seeks to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 2.) Plaintiff’s application makes 19 the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915, and the motion to proceed in forma pauperis is 20 granted. 21 Upon screening the complaint, however, it is clear that the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Harry Franklin v. State of Oregon, State Welfare DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.