Legal Opinion

Neuhaus v. Clark County

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1961PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, C. J.

The trial court based its dismissals in both actions on failure to prosecute under sec. 269.25, Stats. That statute provides:

“The court may without notice dismiss any action or proceeding which is not brought to trial within five years after its commencement.”

The statute is permissive, not mandatory, and unless the judgment of the trial court is clearly the result of an abuse of discretion, this court will not disturb it. See Condon Wrapping Machine Co. v. Racine Engine & Machinery Co. (1924), 183 Wis. 435, 198 N. W. 268. As stated in Hine v. Grant (1903), 119 Wis. 332, 335, 336, 96 N. W.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hoffmann v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Milwaukee Light, Heat & Traction Co. v. Ela Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  3. New York Life Insurance v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Konrad v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Fleming v. EllisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Thomas Ex Rel. Gramling v. MallettWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Marshall-Wisconsin Co. v. Juneau Square Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Metzger v. Wisconsin Department of TaxationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Estate of Makos Ex Rel. Makos v. Wisconsin Masons Health Care FundWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Wegleitner v. SattlerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API